Confidence

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 70 )
Methods ( 61 )
Usability Testing ( 52 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 36 )
Usability ( 32 )
Benchmarking ( 29 )
Customer Experience ( 28 )
User Research ( 27 )
NPS ( 27 )
SUS ( 21 )
Net Promoter Score ( 19 )
Sample Size ( 19 )
Rating Scale ( 18 )
Usability Problems ( 17 )
Metrics ( 15 )
Measurement ( 15 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Validity ( 11 )
Surveys ( 10 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Satisfaction ( 10 )
Market Research ( 9 )
Questionnaires ( 9 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
SUPR-Q ( 8 )
Task Time ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 7 )
Reliability ( 7 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Rating Scales ( 7 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Questionnaire ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Research ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
Analytics ( 5 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Moderation ( 4 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
Unmoderated Research ( 3 )
SEQ ( 3 )
UMUX-lite ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Branding ( 2 )
Data ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
Key Driver ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Summative ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Prototype ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
Formative ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Errors ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Every estimate we make from a sample of customer data contains error. Confidence intervals tell us how much faith we can have in our estimates. Confidence intervals quantify the most likely range for the unknown value we're estimating. For example, if we observe 27 out of 30 users (90%) completing a task, we can be 95% confident that between 74% and 97% of all real-world

Read More

Statistically significant. It's a phrase that's packed with both meaning, and syllables. It's hard to say and harder to understand. Yet it's one of the most common phrases heard when dealing with quantitative methods. While the phrase statistically significant represents the result of a rational exercise with numbers, it has a way of evoking as much emotion.  Bewilderment, resentment, confusion and even arrogance (for those

Read More

There are some interesting known differences between men and women in the psychological literature. For example, women tend to be better judges of emotion when looking at faces for just 0.2 of a second[pdf]! And across many measures of ability, while both men and women tend to exhibit overconfidence, men are generally more overconfident than women  and this is especially the case when men do

Read More