Emoji scale

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 73 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 53 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 37 )
NPS ( 34 )
Benchmarking ( 32 )
Usability ( 32 )
Customer Experience ( 31 )
User Research ( 29 )
SUS ( 28 )
Rating Scale ( 25 )
Net Promoter Score ( 21 )
Sample Size ( 21 )
Metrics ( 17 )
Usability Problems ( 17 )
Measurement ( 15 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Questionnaires ( 14 )
Satisfaction ( 14 )
Validity ( 14 )
Surveys ( 13 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
Rating Scales ( 12 )
Market Research ( 12 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
UMUX-lite ( 10 )
SUPR-Q ( 10 )
Reliability ( 9 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
Task Time ( 8 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
SEQ ( 7 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Research ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Moderation ( 4 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Key Driver ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
Summative ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Voice Interaction ( 3 )
Desirability ( 3 )
Data ( 3 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
Sample Sizes ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
TAM ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
Formative ( 2 )
Variables ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
History of usability ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Emoji scale ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
LTR ( 1 )
graphic scale ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
Likert ( 1 )
Within-subjects ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
Linear Numeric Scale ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Carryover ( 1 )
Polarization ( 1 )
MOS-R ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
Anchoring ( 1 )
Star Scale ( 1 )
slider ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Mean Opinion Scale ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
Visual Analog Scale ( 1 )
sliders ( 1 )
MOS ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
negative scale ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Errors ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Somewhat agree, very satisfied, extremely likely. The labels used on the points of rating scales can affect responses in often unpredictable ways. What’s more, certain terms can get lost in translation when writing surveys for international usage. Some terms may have subtly different meanings, possibly making cross-cultural comparisons problematic. While numbers are universally understood and don’t need translation, does "5" on a seven-point scale properly

Read More