KLM

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 73 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 53 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 36 )
Benchmarking ( 32 )
Usability ( 32 )
NPS ( 31 )
Customer Experience ( 30 )
User Research ( 28 )
SUS ( 25 )
Rating Scale ( 21 )
Net Promoter Score ( 21 )
Sample Size ( 19 )
Usability Problems ( 17 )
Metrics ( 16 )
Measurement ( 15 )
Validity ( 14 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Satisfaction ( 13 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
Questionnaires ( 13 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Surveys ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Rating Scales ( 10 )
Market Research ( 9 )
Reliability ( 9 )
SUPR-Q ( 9 )
Task Time ( 8 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
UMUX-lite ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Research ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
SEQ ( 5 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Moderation ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
ROI ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
Desirability ( 3 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
Data ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
Key Driver ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
Summative ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Voice Interaction ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
LTR ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
TAM ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
History of usability ( 1 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
Likert ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
Formative ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
Errors ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
There’s a continued need to measure and improve the user experience. In principle, it’s easy to see the benefits of having qualified participants use an interface and measuring the experience to produce reliable metrics that can be benchmarked against. But in practice, a number of obstacles make it difficult: time, cost, finding qualified participants, and even obtaining a stable product to test. These challenges seem

Read More

There isn't a usability thermometer to tell us how usable an interface is. We observe the effects and indicators of bad interactions then improve the design. There isn't a single silver bullet technique or tool which will uncover all problems. Instead, practitioners are encouraged to use multiple techniques and triangulate to arrive at a more complete set of problems and solutions. Triangles of course have

Read More