Likert

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 73 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 53 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 37 )
NPS ( 33 )
Benchmarking ( 32 )
Usability ( 32 )
Customer Experience ( 30 )
SUS ( 28 )
User Research ( 28 )
Rating Scale ( 23 )
Net Promoter Score ( 21 )
Sample Size ( 20 )
Usability Problems ( 17 )
Metrics ( 17 )
Measurement ( 15 )
Satisfaction ( 14 )
Validity ( 14 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Questionnaires ( 13 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
Surveys ( 13 )
Rating Scales ( 12 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Market Research ( 9 )
SUPR-Q ( 9 )
Reliability ( 9 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
Task Time ( 8 )
UMUX-lite ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Research ( 6 )
SEQ ( 6 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Moderation ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Desirability ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
Variables ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
TAM ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Data ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
Voice Interaction ( 2 )
Key Driver ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Summative ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
History of usability ( 1 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
LTR ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
Within-subjects ( 1 )
Linear Numeric Scale ( 1 )
Carryover ( 1 )
Polarization ( 1 )
MOS-R ( 1 )
Anchoring ( 1 )
Star Scale ( 1 )
slider ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
Likert ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
Sample Sizes ( 1 )
Visual Analog Scale ( 1 )
sliders ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Errors ( 1 )
MOS ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Formative ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
There’s a lot of conventional wisdom floating around the Internet about rating scales. What you should and shouldn’t do. Best practices for points, labels, and formats. It can be hard to differentiate between science-backed conclusions and just practitioner preferences. In this article, we’ll answer some of the more common questions that come up about rating scales, examine claims by reviewing the literature, and summarize the

Read More