LTR

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 73 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 53 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 36 )
Benchmarking ( 32 )
Usability ( 32 )
NPS ( 31 )
Customer Experience ( 30 )
User Research ( 28 )
SUS ( 25 )
Rating Scale ( 21 )
Net Promoter Score ( 21 )
Sample Size ( 19 )
Usability Problems ( 17 )
Metrics ( 16 )
Measurement ( 15 )
Validity ( 14 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Satisfaction ( 13 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
Questionnaires ( 13 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Surveys ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Rating Scales ( 10 )
Market Research ( 9 )
Reliability ( 9 )
SUPR-Q ( 9 )
Task Time ( 8 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
UMUX-lite ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Research ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
SEQ ( 5 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Moderation ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
ROI ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
Desirability ( 3 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
Data ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
Key Driver ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
Summative ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Voice Interaction ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
LTR ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
TAM ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
History of usability ( 1 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
Likert ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
Formative ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
Errors ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
Numbers are universally understood across cultures, geography, and languages. But when those numbers are applied to sentiments (for example, satisfaction, agreement, or intention), do people respond universally or does a 4 on a five-point scale elicit different reactions based on culture or geography? Many international organizations use similar sets of measures (such as satisfaction or the Net Promoter Score) to compare countries and regions. If

Read More