PhD

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 73 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 53 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 37 )
NPS ( 33 )
Benchmarking ( 32 )
Usability ( 32 )
Customer Experience ( 30 )
SUS ( 28 )
User Research ( 28 )
Rating Scale ( 23 )
Net Promoter Score ( 21 )
Sample Size ( 20 )
Usability Problems ( 17 )
Metrics ( 17 )
Measurement ( 15 )
Satisfaction ( 14 )
Validity ( 14 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Questionnaires ( 13 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
Surveys ( 13 )
Rating Scales ( 12 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Market Research ( 9 )
SUPR-Q ( 9 )
Reliability ( 9 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
Task Time ( 8 )
UMUX-lite ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Research ( 6 )
SEQ ( 6 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Moderation ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Desirability ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
Variables ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
TAM ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Data ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
Voice Interaction ( 2 )
Key Driver ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Summative ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
History of usability ( 1 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
LTR ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
Within-subjects ( 1 )
Linear Numeric Scale ( 1 )
Carryover ( 1 )
Polarization ( 1 )
MOS-R ( 1 )
Anchoring ( 1 )
Star Scale ( 1 )
slider ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
Likert ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
Sample Sizes ( 1 )
Visual Analog Scale ( 1 )
sliders ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Errors ( 1 )
MOS ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Formative ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
There’s been a long heated debate within the industry about the need to certify User Experience practitioners. After all, many professional organizations—accountants, realtors, attorneys, and even ergonomists—have some sort of official certification. Certifications provide some indication that a minimum threshold of competence has been demonstrated, which in theory should help prospective employers, customers, and the industry as a whole. Certification may even be helpful with

Read More

Does a PhD pay off financially? I recently helped conduct the statistical analysis of the UPA 2009 salary survey[pdf], and used this opportunity to look into the data to see if I could calculate how much a PhD affects salaries in this profession.  The dataset contains salary information for a wide range of jobs in the profession—usability engineers, designers, managers and information architects. The vast

Read More