TAM

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 73 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 53 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 36 )
Usability ( 32 )
Benchmarking ( 32 )
Customer Experience ( 29 )
User Research ( 28 )
NPS ( 28 )
SUS ( 23 )
Net Promoter Score ( 20 )
Sample Size ( 19 )
Rating Scale ( 19 )
Usability Problems ( 17 )
Metrics ( 16 )
Measurement ( 15 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
Satisfaction ( 13 )
Validity ( 12 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Questionnaires ( 12 )
Surveys ( 11 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Rating Scales ( 9 )
Market Research ( 9 )
SUPR-Q ( 9 )
Task Time ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
Reliability ( 7 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Questionnaire ( 6 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Research ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Moderation ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
SEQ ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
Unmoderated Research ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
UMUX-lite ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Excel ( 2 )
Summative ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
Key Driver ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Data ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
LTR ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
TAM ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
Prototype ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Desirability ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Errors ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
Formative ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
We write extensively about standardized UX metrics such as the SUS, PSSUQ, and SUPR-Q. The main benefits of standardization include improved reliability, validity, sensitivity, objectivity, quantification, economy, communication, and norms. Even when standardized UX questionnaires are developed independently, they are influenced by earlier work, just like how UX itself is a new field built upon earlier fields. The deep roots of questionnaire development date back over

Read More