How to Estimate SUS Using the UX-Lite

If you build it, they will come. That may work for a field of dreams. But when it comes to software and products, if you want people to stay and use the product, it had better be useful and usable. Or, at least, the users should think that it will be useful and usable. That’s

Read More »

Evolution of the UX-Lite

What makes a product successful? How does a new technology get adopted? Whether business software, a mobile app, or a physical product, there are plenty of examples of products that had a lot of promise but failed, and others that many consider a success. Plenty of books expound theories on developing a successful product (e.g.,

Read More »

Revisiting the Evidence for the Left-Side Bias in Rating Scales

Are people more likely to select response options that are on the left side of a rating scale? About ten years ago, we provided a brief literature review of the published evidence, which suggested that this so-called left-side bias not only existed but also was detected almost 100 years ago in some of the earliest

Read More »

Leading Vs. Lagging Measures in UX

Driving down the road while only looking in the rearview mirror … that gives you a good idea of where you’ve been, but unless the road behind you is exactly like the one in front of you, you may run into some obstacles, to put it mildly. Safe and effective driving means looking forward and

Read More »

Three Branches of Standardized UX Measurement

We write extensively about standardized UX metrics such as the SUS, PSSUQ, and SUPR-Q. The main benefits of standardization include improved reliability, validity, sensitivity, objectivity, quantification, economy, communication, and norms. Even when standardized UX questionnaires are developed independently, they are influenced by earlier work, just like how UX itself is a new field built upon earlier

Read More »
0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop
    Scroll to Top