Unmoderated Research

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 73 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 55 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 37 )
NPS ( 34 )
Usability ( 32 )
Benchmarking ( 32 )
Customer Experience ( 31 )
User Research ( 29 )
SUS ( 28 )
Rating Scale ( 25 )
Sample Size ( 24 )
Net Promoter Score ( 22 )
Usability Problems ( 18 )
Metrics ( 17 )
Measurement ( 16 )
Questionnaires ( 15 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Satisfaction ( 14 )
Validity ( 14 )
Rating Scales ( 14 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
Surveys ( 13 )
Market Research ( 12 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
SUPR-Q ( 11 )
UMUX-lite ( 11 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Reliability ( 10 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
Task Time ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
SEQ ( 7 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Research ( 6 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Moderation ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
Summative ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
Key Driver ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Data ( 3 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
TAM ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Desirability ( 3 )
Voice Interaction ( 3 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
Sample Sizes ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
Variables ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Formative ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
Errors ( 2 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
negative scale ( 1 )
graphic scale ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
History of usability ( 1 )
coding ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
Measure ( 1 )
Probability ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
Likert ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
Linear Numeric Scale ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Star Scale ( 1 )
Within-subjects ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Polarization ( 1 )
Carryover ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
MOS ( 1 )
Mean Opinion Scale ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
Emoji scale ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
Anchoring ( 1 )
slider ( 1 )
Visual Analog Scale ( 1 )
sliders ( 1 )
MOS-R ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Bias ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
LTR ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
If users can’t complete a task, not much else matters. Consequently, task completion is one of the fundamental UX measures and one of the most commonly collected metrics, even in small-sample formative studies and studies of low-fidelity prototypes. Task completion is usually easy to collect, and it’s easy to understand and communicate. It’s typically coded as a binary measure (success or fail) dependent on a participant

Read More

One of these things is not like the other. That’s the theme of a segment on the long-running US TV show Sesame Street. As children, we learn to identify similarities and differences. And after seeing a group of things that look similar, we tend to remember the differences. Why? Well, one theory describes something called the isolation effect, or the Von Restorff effect. The name

Read More

Unmoderated testing platforms allow for quick data collection from large sample sizes. This has enabled researchers to answer questions that were previously difficult or cost prohibitive to answer with traditional lab-based testing. But is the data collected in unmoderated studies, both behavioral and attitudinal, comparable to what you get from a more traditional lab setup? Comparing Metrics There are several ways to compare the agreement or

Read More

Small differences in design changes can have large consequences on website purchases. But detecting these small differences (e.g. 2%–10% changes) through behaviors and attitudes has generally not been feasible from traditional lab-based testing due to the time and costs of recruiting and facilitator costs/time. With unmoderated testing, organizations can now collect data from hundreds to thousands of participants quickly and from around the world to

Read More

To understand problems on a website, nothing quite beats watching users. The process provides a wealth of information both about what users can or can’t do and what might be causing problems in an interface. The major drawback to watching users live or recordings of sessions is that it takes a lot of focused time. 5 to 20 participants—the typical sample size in moderated studies—isn’t

Read More