Visual Appeal

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 74 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 55 )
Statistics ( 52 )
Survey ( 41 )
NPS ( 39 )
Benchmarking ( 33 )
Usability ( 32 )
Sample Size ( 32 )
Rating Scale ( 32 )
Customer Experience ( 31 )
User Research ( 29 )
SUS ( 28 )
Net Promoter Score ( 28 )
Usability Problems ( 18 )
Questionnaires ( 18 )
Rating Scales ( 17 )
Metrics ( 17 )
Measurement ( 16 )
User Experience ( 15 )
UMUX-lite ( 15 )
Surveys ( 15 )
Satisfaction ( 14 )
Validity ( 14 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Market Research ( 12 )
SUPR-Q ( 12 )
Reliability ( 11 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
Task Time ( 8 )
SEQ ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Research ( 7 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Confidence ( 6 )
Confidence Intervals ( 6 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
Credibility ( 4 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Moderation ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Key Driver ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
sliders ( 4 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Summative ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
TAM ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Desirability ( 3 )
Voice Interaction ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Data ( 3 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
Correlation ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Errors ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
slider ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Sample Sizes ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
LTR ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Variables ( 2 )
Sensitivity ( 2 )
Emoji scale ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
Formative ( 2 )
Star Scale ( 2 )
Carryover ( 1 )
Within-subjects ( 1 )
Visual Analog Scale ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Linear Numeric Scale ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Polarization ( 1 )
Likert ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
Mean Opinion Scale ( 1 )
Latin Squares ( 1 )
Greco-Latin Squares ( 1 )
Research design ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
Randomization ( 1 )
Report ( 1 )
Single Ease Question ( 1 )
R ( 1 )
t-test ( 1 )
Bias ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
History of usability ( 1 )
MOS ( 1 )
MOS-R ( 1 )
graphic scale ( 1 )
negative scale ( 1 )
Probability ( 1 )
Measure ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
coding ( 1 )
Anchoring ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Statistical Significance ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
Is a beautiful website more usable? Psychological literature has discussed, for some time, the "what is beautiful is good" phenomenon. That is, we ascribe positive attributes to things that are more attractive. This applies to people and likely to products and websites, as well. But does that positive halo also carry over to our impressions of website usability? It's a bit of an open research

Read More