While there are many causes for the differences, one major reason is that evaluators disagree on what constitutes a problem.
Usability is often at odds with security and business interests—what’s best for the user may not be the best for the organization.
If a clear source of revenue or customer-leads interferes with users goals, is it a usability problem? And should these events even be reported by usability evaluators?
A common place where this collision occurs is with default choices. The simple decision on what choice to preselect (if any) has real consequences. There are books written about defaulting retirement options and organ donation. It’s no wonder that such issues often get called usability issues by some and features by others.
Default Check Box for Sign Up
Email newsletters continue to be a major channel for online marketing and sales. Is pre-selecting the check box a usability problem or a feature?
Optional Insurance Protection
Default Option Selected
In the recent Comparative Usability Evaluation, Rolf Molich reported that only 1 of 19 professional usability experts that watched the same video of users renting a U-Haul reported the following as a usability issue. The default option for Damage Protection doesn’t cover the costs of the damage to other people or property and can be insufficient.
Is this a usability problem or is providing the default with some coverage the right choice?
No Option Selected
When you purchase an airline ticket, you’re often presented with an option to purchase Trip Cancellation insurance. On Frontierairlines.com, there’s no choice defaulted. I suspect they could really increase revenues by defaulting the optional insurance to “Yes.” But would that make it a usability issue?
An Encouraged Option
As an interesting compromise, Budget.com offers the “highly recommended” option for the optional Loss Damage Waiver protection. It isn’t selected, but it’s as encouraged as the GPS.
Links to Ads
When you click on a link to Yahoo Mail from a MyYahoo.com page, it doesn’t take you to your Inbox as you’d expect, it instead takes you to a “What’s New” page loaded with ads and requires another link to your Inbox.
Pageviews matter a lot for ad-revenue. But will this frustrate too many users? Is this a feature or usability problem?
In other cases it’s not the default options, it’s by-passing all the add-ons and up-sells. For example, if you want to renew your hosting with GoDaddy, you have to pass through at least 4 pages and on one page alone you have to scroll past 15 check-boxes, 15 drop-down lists to get to the “No Thanks” button.
Requiring all this scrolling and distracting options increases tasks times and may lead to more cart-abandonment. But I suspect these are lucrative revenue opportunities for GoDaddy. Is this a Usability Problem or Feature?
The UpSell with Ambiguous Default
Jared Spool discussed balancing business and usability and provided the example of the United.com Award accelerator. The upsell is both defaulted and the opt-out selection is clearly dwarfed by the giant “Add Option” button. Is this a usability problem or a feature?
Image used shamelessly without permission.
Online banking and credit cards are on the front-lines in the battle between usability and security. Just to login you usually have to remember usernames, passwords, security questions and security images.
Then, to make a payment you often have to agree to terms and conditions, submit the payment then confirm the payment. Is requiring 3-4 steps to make a payment a usability issue or a security feature?
Usability and Business Interests aren’t mutually exclusive
There has to be a balance between usability, business and security. Even the most intransigent usability wonk would agree to that. But when there’s too little usability and too much business someone has to sound the alarm. And while security is essential, it shouldn’t discourage usage.
Successful companies know how to provide long-term value to a customer. If users feel like you tricked them into a purchase or signing-up, you may have helped your numbers in the short-term, but at what cost?
Revenue is a lagging indicator and it’s often too late to fix problems once they show up on balance sheets. Measures of customer loyalty are driven by usability, so a usability evaluator should report on usability problems (or any problem) even when they conflict with clear streams of income.
However, it should come as no surprise that business leaders want to understand the impact on revenue before making design changes. That’s an opportunity to change the conversation from usability versus revenue to short-term revenue at the expense of long-term profits.