Sensitivity

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 73 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 55 )
Statistics ( 51 )
Survey ( 38 )
NPS ( 34 )
Benchmarking ( 32 )
Usability ( 32 )
Customer Experience ( 31 )
User Research ( 29 )
SUS ( 28 )
Sample Size ( 26 )
Rating Scale ( 25 )
Net Promoter Score ( 22 )
Usability Problems ( 18 )
Metrics ( 17 )
Questionnaires ( 16 )
Measurement ( 16 )
User Experience ( 14 )
Satisfaction ( 14 )
Validity ( 14 )
Rating Scales ( 14 )
Surveys ( 13 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
UMUX-lite ( 12 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Market Research ( 12 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Reliability ( 11 )
SUPR-Q ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Task Time ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
SEQ ( 7 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Research ( 6 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Credibility ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Confidence ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
Confidence Intervals ( 4 )
Moderation ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
Summative ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
Voice Interaction ( 3 )
sliders ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Key Driver ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
Desirability ( 3 )
Data ( 3 )
TAM ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Excel ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
Sensitivity ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
Errors ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Correlation ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
Star Scale ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Emoji scale ( 2 )
slider ( 2 )
Sample Sizes ( 2 )
LTR ( 2 )
Variables ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
Formative ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Likert ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
Latin Squares ( 1 )
Visual Analog Scale ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
History of usability ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
Greco-Latin Squares ( 1 )
Linear Numeric Scale ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
Bias ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Mean Opinion Scale ( 1 )
graphic scale ( 1 )
Probability ( 1 )
Measure ( 1 )
coding ( 1 )
negative scale ( 1 )
MOS ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
Carryover ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
Within-subjects ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Research design ( 1 )
MOS-R ( 1 )
Anchoring ( 1 )
Polarization ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Rating scales have been around for close to a century. It’s no wonder there are many questions about best practices and pitfalls to avoid. And like any topic that’s been around for that long, there are urban legends, partial truths, context-dependent findings, and just plain misconceptions about the “right” and “wrong” way to use and interpret rating scales. We’ve been researching and conducting our own

Read More

Sliders are a type of visual analog scale that can be used with many online survey tools such as our MUIQ platform. The literature on their overall effectiveness is mixed (Roster et al., 2015). On the positive side, evidence indicates that sliders might be more engaging to respondents. On the negative side, evidence also indicates that sliders can be more cognitively and physically challenging than

Read More