SEQ

Browse Content by Topic

UX ( 74 )
Methods ( 62 )
Usability Testing ( 55 )
Statistics ( 52 )
Survey ( 41 )
NPS ( 39 )
Benchmarking ( 33 )
Usability ( 32 )
Sample Size ( 32 )
Rating Scale ( 32 )
Customer Experience ( 31 )
User Research ( 29 )
SUS ( 28 )
Net Promoter Score ( 28 )
Usability Problems ( 18 )
Questionnaires ( 18 )
Rating Scales ( 17 )
Metrics ( 17 )
Measurement ( 16 )
User Experience ( 15 )
UMUX-lite ( 15 )
Surveys ( 15 )
Satisfaction ( 14 )
Validity ( 14 )
Usability Metrics ( 13 )
SUPRQ ( 12 )
Market Research ( 12 )
SUPR-Q ( 12 )
Reliability ( 11 )
Qualitative ( 11 )
Navigation ( 10 )
Heuristic Evaluation ( 8 )
Task Time ( 8 )
SEQ ( 8 )
UX Metrics ( 8 )
Research ( 7 )
Task Completion ( 7 )
Questionnaire ( 7 )
Confidence ( 6 )
Confidence Intervals ( 6 )
Mobile Usability Testing ( 6 )
Analytics ( 6 )
Mobile ( 6 )
Unmoderated Research ( 5 )
Visualizing Data ( 5 )
Six Sigma ( 5 )
Usability Problem ( 5 )
Credibility ( 4 )
UX Methods ( 4 )
Moderation ( 4 )
UX Maturity ( 4 )
Task Times ( 4 )
Key Driver ( 4 )
Quantitative ( 4 )
Loyalty ( 4 )
Expert Review ( 4 )
sliders ( 4 )
Lean UX ( 3 )
Customer Segmentation ( 3 )
Card Sorting ( 3 )
Summative ( 3 )
Usability Lab ( 3 )
TAM ( 3 )
ROI ( 3 )
PURE ( 3 )
Desirability ( 3 )
Voice Interaction ( 3 )
Task Metrics ( 3 )
Data ( 3 )
Focus Groups ( 2 )
Correlation ( 2 )
SUM ( 2 )
Excel ( 2 )
Findability ( 2 )
PhD ( 2 )
Errors ( 2 )
Remote Usability Testing ( 2 )
KLM ( 2 )
Salary Survey ( 2 )
Branding ( 2 )
Tree Testing ( 2 )
IA ( 2 )
Tasks ( 2 )
UX Salary Survey ( 2 )
A/B Testing ( 2 )
Personas ( 2 )
slider ( 2 )
Marketing ( 2 )
Sample Sizes ( 2 )
Prototype ( 2 )
LTR ( 2 )
Eye-Tracking ( 2 )
Variables ( 2 )
Sensitivity ( 2 )
Emoji scale ( 2 )
Cognitive Walkthrough ( 2 )
Formative ( 2 )
Star Scale ( 2 )
Carryover ( 1 )
Within-subjects ( 1 )
Visual Analog Scale ( 1 )
Desktop ( 1 )
Linear Numeric Scale ( 1 )
User-Centred Design ( 1 )
Cumulative Graphs ( 1 )
Task Randomization ( 1 )
Test Metrics ( 1 )
Quality ( 1 )
Margin of Error ( 1 )
Meeting software ( 1 )
Polarization ( 1 )
Likert ( 1 )
consumer software ( 1 )
b2b software ( 1 )
Design Thinking ( 1 )
Mean Opinion Scale ( 1 )
Latin Squares ( 1 )
Greco-Latin Squares ( 1 )
Research design ( 1 )
Information Architecture ( 1 )
Site Analytics ( 1 )
Randomization ( 1 )
Report ( 1 )
Single Ease Question ( 1 )
R ( 1 )
t-test ( 1 )
Bias ( 1 )
Contextual Inquiry ( 1 )
Problem Severity ( 1 )
History of usability ( 1 )
MOS ( 1 )
MOS-R ( 1 )
graphic scale ( 1 )
negative scale ( 1 )
Probability ( 1 )
Measure ( 1 )
Mobile Usability ( 1 )
coding ( 1 )
Anchoring ( 1 )
Formative testing ( 1 )
Certification ( 1 )
Top Task Analysis ( 1 )
True Intent ( 1 )
Visual Appeal ( 1 )
Design ( 1 )
Facilitation ( 1 )
User Testing ( 1 )
Effect Size ( 1 )
protoype ( 1 )
Unmoderated ( 1 )
Task Completin ( 1 )
Affinity ( 1 )
Crowdsourcing ( 1 )
Random ( 1 )
Think Aloud ( 1 )
Trust ( 1 )
Sample ( 1 )
Statistical Significance ( 1 )
Z-Score ( 1 )
Performance ( 1 )
Perceptions ( 1 )
Five ( 1 )
Persona ( 1 )
Metric ( 1 )
Conjoint Analysis ( 1 )
Regression Analysis ( 1 )
AttrakDiff2 ( 1 )
UEQ ( 1 )
Hedonic usability ( 1 )
Expectations ( 1 )
MUSiC ( 1 )
RITE ( 1 )
Competitive ( 1 )
CUE ( 1 )
meCUE2.0 ( 1 )
Microsoft Desirability Toolkit ( 1 )
Software ( 1 )
moderated ( 1 )
Moderating ( 1 )
Segmentation ( 1 )
NSAT ( 1 )
Customer effort ( 1 )
PSSUQ ( 1 )
Ordinal ( 1 )
CSUQ ( 1 )
Delight ( 1 )
ISO ( 1 )
Despite the ease with which you can create surveys using software like our MUIQ platform, selecting specific questions and response options can be a bit more involved. Most surveys contain a mix of closed-ended (often rating scales) and open-ended questions. We’ve previously discussed 15 types of common rating scales and have published numerous articles  in which we investigated their measurement properties. Now we turn our

Read More

We typically recommend small sample sizes (5–10) for conducting iterative usability testing meant to find and fix problems (formative evaluations). For benchmark or comparative studies, where the focus is on detecting differences or estimating population parameters (summative evaluations), we recommend using larger sample sizes (20–100+). Usability testing can be used to uncover problems and assess the experience. Many usability tests will play both roles simultaneously, formative

Read More

One of the primary goals of measuring the user experience is to see whether design efforts actually make a quantifiable difference over time. A regular benchmark study is a great way to institutionalize the idea of quantifiable differences. Benchmarks are most effective when done at regular intervals (e.g., quarterly or yearly) or after significant design or feature changes. A UX benchmark is something akin to

Read More

If users can’t complete a task, not much else matters. Consequently, task completion is one of the fundamental UX measures and one of the most commonly collected metrics, even in small-sample formative studies and studies of low-fidelity prototypes. Task completion is usually easy to collect, and it’s easy to understand and communicate. It’s typically coded as a binary measure (success or fail) dependent on a participant

Read More

Numbers are universally understood across cultures, geography, and languages. But when those numbers are applied to sentiments (for example, satisfaction, agreement, or intention), do people respond universally or does a 4 on a five-point scale elicit different reactions based on culture or geography? Many international organizations use similar sets of measures (such as satisfaction or the Net Promoter Score) to compare countries and regions. If

Read More

Our attitudes both reflect and affect our actions. What we think affects what we do and what we do affects what we think. It’s not a perfect relationship of course. What people say or think doesn’t always directly correspond to actions in easily predictable ways. Understanding and measuring user attitudes early and often can provide a good indication of likely future behaviors. Attitudes can be

Read More

The Single Ease Question (SEQ) is a 7-point rating scale to assess how difficult users find a task. It's administered immediately after a user attempts a task in a usability test. After users attempt a task, ask them this simple question: Overall, how difficult or easy was the task to complete? Use the seven point rating scale format below. Labels and values: We typically label

Read More

Have you ever watched a user perform horribly during a usability test only to watch in amazement as they rate a task as very easy to use? I have, and as long as I've been conducting usability tests, I've heard of this contradictory behavior from other researchers. Such occurrences have led many to discount the collection of satisfaction data altogether. In fact I've often heard

Read More